[BASEBALL] My take on the Cole Hamels/Bryce Harper Thing

I’ve been keeping up with this story as it’s developed…well, I should say ‘non-story’…because to me, and many in the baseball world, this is truly a non-story.

In case you aren’t aware of what happened, Cole Hamels, one of the better pitchers in the NL East, and a guy that’s been a part of many pennant winning teams for the Phillies, came out and said yesterday that he intentionally plunked Nationals rookie OF Bryce Harper, calling it an “old school” move on his part.

Now to his credit, Harper didn’t complain at all…in fact, later in the inning, he took advantage of a 1st and 3rd situation to steal home on Hamels, and by doing so, evened the score.

Now we’ve got Nationals GM Mike Rizzo speaking publicly about this saying, “I’ve never seen a more classless, gutless chicken (bleep) act in my 30 years in baseball,” Rizzo said, according to the report. “With all the bounty (stuff) going on in professional football, the commissioner better act with a purpose on this thing.”

A couple things here…

This is an old school baseball play, no matter what you think you know about baseball. Guys hit other guys all the time, and here’s why it happened. The Phillies are your reigning 5-time NL East Champion, but they are currently in last place in the NL East.  Consequently, the Nationals are in 1st place, riding a great April to hold a slim half game lead over the Atlanta Braves. Now back in the day, when you had a rookie come up with the kind of hype surrounding Bryce Harper (relatively speaking of course because I can’t remember many position prospects that had as much hype as this kid has had), you would see a guy take a shot at him from the mound as a way of saying “Welcome to the big leagues.” And in many cases, the phenom player would attempt to get back at the pitcher, by taking him deep. This continues to this day.

But in this particular case, as I said, the Phillies are in last place, a game under .500, and here’s this kid up here representing the franchise as a 19-year old phenom. Cole Hamels wanted to make the statement, and that statement is this: “Yeah, we see you, kid. And we know you’re good. But we’re the champs, and until you beat me and beat us, you haven’t done anything yet.”

The problem comes when Hamels is asked by the reporter if he hit Harper on purpose. I don’t blame the reporter; he’s got to ask the question. I blame Hamels for admitting it. Here’s the thing…they call it an unwritten rule for a reason. There’s not one person in either dugout during that game that didn’t know exactly what was happening there, especially Harper himself.

So why didn’t Hamels just say “No comment” when the reporter asked him about the beaning? I don’t know…maybe he was trying to make a statement both on and off the field. I think that’s why you’re seeing some baseball guys, namely former pitchers, come out and say that Hamels was either wrong or that he didn’t handle it right.

Another thing to point out is the idiocy of Rizzo’s comment…to compare this with the bounty scandal currently being dealt with the NFL with the New Orleans Saints is completely out of line. It’s nowhere close to the same, and if he considers himself a “baseball guy” for the last 30 years, then he’s seen his share of beanings, intentional and non-intentional. Nobody was hurt, and he wasn’t throwing at his head. He wanted to send a message, so Hamels put one in his back.

Trust me, a guy like Cole Hamels can put it anywhere he wants. He’s walked a grand total of 6 people all year so far and averages less than 50 walks a year…he’s a control guy (with a great arm) and can do what he wants with a baseball. He could’ve put it in Harper’s ear if he wanted to.

In all honesty, the play was over when Hamels got plunked by Nationals SP Jordan Zimmerman later in the game. Both benches were warned and that was it. That’s the way this thing goes in baseball and how it’s gone for a long, long time. But now because of idiots like Hamels (who couldn’t just say “no comment” when no comment was needed) and Rizzo, the Commissioner is going to have to respond, with either a fine or a suspension (or both). And that’s the real shame here…this is 2012, yes, and I admit that player safety in all sports has taken center stage with the recent bounty scandal in the NFL.

But of all the major sports in the US, baseball is far and away the least violent of the group…perhaps even less violent as a whole than football, basketball, hockey and NASCAR racing is combined. Baseball doesn’t have huge safety concerns all the time…and this certainly isn’t one of them.

The sad thing is that more and more people are going to hop on the bandwagon started by Rizzo and his asinine comments. This is nothing more than a baseball player making a baseball play that affected one other player in a show of old school tactics. We knew that then and we know that now, the only thing that’s changed is that some people want to talk about it when the thing to do is just shut the hell up and play.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “[BASEBALL] My take on the Cole Hamels/Bryce Harper Thing

  1. Picking up where we left off…your opinions are certainly valid. Had Hamels kept his mouth shut, it wouldn’t have blown up like it did. It would have still been a story because it involved Bryce Harper, but maybe not *as* big a deal. That being said, Hamels could still have been suspended. I can’t give an example off the top of my head, but I remember pitchers being suspended while maintaining that the bean in question wasn’t intentional. Whether he had admitted it or not, this was obvious. I can’t say how I’d react if it were one of the Braves. There have been times when I wanted our guys to get some revenge; hell, tonight’s game against the Cubs turned into a beanfest. But I feel like there are also plenty examples when Braves batters get hit, possibly intentionally, and there is no retaliation. Freeman got hit in the first inning Sunday after the whole Chipper/Moyer thing happened and there was no retaliation.

    In this case, it wasn’t a retaliation. It was just a case of a guy throwing a 92 mph fastball at another guy because…he’s young and good. I can’t remember a single time in the last 20 years that a Braves pitcher threw at a guy just for the sake of throwing at him. Hamels wanted to give Harper an “old school welcome.” Like I said before, that is an archaic way of thinking about baseball. If Harper had hit a homer the night before and showboated, it would be understandable. Still not right in my opinion, but understandable. But in this particular situation, it’s just uncalled for. It’s not a baseball play, it’s an outdated act of showmanship. A baseball play would have been to throw up and in to defend against a possible suicide squeeze.

    My personal opinion is that intentionally hitting a batter, regardless of the situation, has no place in the game. I understand the the retaliatory beans are never going to go away, and that’s fine. But what Hamels did is just unacceptable, and it puts these guys’ livelihoods in jeopardy.

    1. Just to be clear, I don’t think I ever condoned what Hamels did. He was certainly stepping outside the boundaries of what is good baseball to me. My entire point was that people were making way too big a deal about it, and still are in my opinion, and if it was anybody except Bryce Harper, it wouldn’t have been a big deal.

      I agree that if you aren’t provoked, there really isn’t a place for an intentional beaning…yes, it’s old school, but that doesn’t make it right or good. When you have rivalries and you get heated play, things like this will happen from time to time, but at the end of the day, players usually have a way of working this type of thing out on their own.

      Thanks for the discussion…hate that we took it on the chin last night, but we’ll bounce back tonight.

  2. Nice take on it! Here in Philly, Hamels is overall considered a stand-up guy. Not only has he been a part of champion teams, but his efforts off the field are well recognized. In this instance, the California boy was just being naively honest. To his detriment, yes… but not really. Rizzo is the real headcase here. Rizzo fired off about it, and forced MLB to respond… so they responded with a 5 game suspension, which to a starting pitcher is a *tiny* slap on the wrist. Essentially, the rotation will be adjusted with a rarely used pitcher thrown in for 1 game, and this is the worst case scenario.

    Here in Philly we aren’t applauding him (1st inning?! It led to a run scored! Not the brightest when the offense is quick as molasses this season), but at the same time we aren’t really hating the tactic either. I agree… its old school ball, and fully part of the unwritten code.

    Worst part is that I *like* the Nationals… they’ve had a few down and out seasons, but thats to be expected when you’re playing to mostly empty seats. They’re on their way up, though, and I’m only just starting to appreciate the Braves again after their decade long trouncing of the NL East. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s